## Hallelujah! Finding two-step function rules from tables

Maybe this method that I discovered from an exhaustive internet search is well-known to most, but maybe it’s not.  So, I decided to post it just in case.  That and, quite frankly, I am so freaking excited about it and my husband will have NO idea what I’m talking about if I decide to spew it all over him!

When I was in school a billion years ago, many things were taught as “guess-and-check.”  For instance, factoring quadratics. (I learned an awesome no-fail method for that last fall from my cooperating teacher during my internship- I’ll post that sometime soon.)  I don’t know about any of you, but I HATE guess-and-check.  Besides, how do you even TEACH guess-and-check?

What prompted my diehard search for an easier way of finding function rules?  My kiddos.  I was out of work last week due to an emergency surgery (yeah, 4th week of my first year teaching is a fabulous time to have your gall bladder removed!), so my sub covered the lesson involving finding function rules given a table.  She’s completely competent (she’s my ESE teacher for one of my classes and she’s certified in math), so I don’t think it was a lack of instruction on the concept.  She probably taught them the same exact way I would have: guess-and-check until you’re good enough to just “see” the rule.  Well, the majority of my poor kids don’t get it- at all!  So, today I was frustrated due to the gazillion questions during their end-of-unit test.  Clearly, if they are all asking questions about the same test item something needs to be done.

Cue in research.

I found this explanation in a math forum.  I’m so happy I did.  It’s not the prettiest or clearest of explanations, so I’ll try to make it a bit prettier here.

Take, for instance, the below table.

 Input, x Output, y 1 7 2 11 3 15 4 19 5 23

The first thing you do is take 2 sets of numbers (ordered pairs):

(1,7) and (4,19) ; any 2 sets will work

Next, find the difference in x-values and y-values:

x-values: 4-1 =3

y-values: 19-7 =12

Notice that the difference in y’s is 4 times the difference in x’s:

3 * 4 = 12

Therefore, 4 is your multiplier for the rule.

So, we know that 4x plus or minus something = y.

From here, it’s easy to tell what we have to add or subtract to get y.

4(1) = 4

4+3=7

Thus, y= 4x + 3!

Again, this may be somewhat common knowledge in the math community at this point.   However, I figured if I was clueless to this method then maybe (hopefully!) someone else is, too.  At least, that is what I am going to tell myself to fall asleep tonight!

I cannot wait to show this to my kids tomorrow!!!

Tagged ,

## 10 thoughts on “Hallelujah! Finding two-step function rules from tables”

1. Andrew says:

Your experience reminds me of when I learned about function patterns my first year as an undergraduate. All of a sudden I had a way to figure out what type of function generated a list of data — and even though it was very simple and obvious in retrospect, I was positive I’d never seen them before!

As another explanation of your method here, what you are doing is finding the equation of a line passing through two points by first calculating the slope (change in y divided by the change in x to get the ‘multiplier’), then plugging in one of the points to get the y-intercept!

And yet another way to think about this solution: The “steps” between my inputs are always 1, and the “steps” between my output are always 4. That is, I take 4 y-steps for every x-step; if I want a rule for the y-steps I can use dimensional analysis to say “4 y-steps per 1 x-step times X x-steps is Y y-steps” — and if I extend the data table back one value, I get input 0, output 3, so my starting y-step is 3. Thus, Y = 4X + 3 🙂

• Yes, exactly! It’s so funny that I just couldn’t think of the way to explain it to them without saying “slope” or using the formal method of finding it.

2. vanvleettv says:

I was taught the guess and check way, so I have not come across this way of finding the rules before…interesting. I will have to play around with it. Thanks for the post!

3. Tamara Ia says:

Bless you! I’m furiously trying to help my daughter understand this (as she was not comprehending the lesson in school) and I am “math-dumb”. You have saved the day for both of us. Thank you!

4. anonymous says:

This is amazing! My daughter came home from school and told me that guess and check wasn’t always working for her…so, our internet search began! We are both really excited about findings. Many thanks!

5. Szyd says:

So well explained! Thank you!!!!

6. Michelle says:

Thank you, Thank you. I never knew this and was looking for a way to teach my son how to figure out a two-step function rule based on data in a table. I knew that guess and check would never work for him. This will. I can’t wait to teach him.

7. Krissanna says:

Wow! I’ve been having a hard time figuring out the in and out table in school and this helped me really well.

8. Thank you! I had a tutoring student tonight and couldn’t think of a better way than guess and check. This is so much better!

mathcoachblog

Ramblings of a HS Math Teacher

Productive Struggle

Teachers Working Together to make our Struggles Productive

Just My Lucky Life

Life after infertility, adoption, and gastric bypass surgery

King of the hills

Ebenezer's blog!

Algebrainiac

Are you pondering what I'm pondering?

PPerfect Squares

Simple roots everywhere

Quantum Progress

Raising the energy level of my physics classes

War and Piecewise Functions

a math teacher blog. all opinions are my own.

It's all math.

Teach it. Learn it. Live it.

an intermittent blog on Math Education

Algebra 2 #180

What's Happening This Year?!

the space between

Living, loving and DIYing in the now, that little space between what has been and what will be.

Math and more Math

Heather Simmons

tothesquareinch

Just another WordPress.com site

I Speak Math

Integrating Technology and Mathematics

Continuous Everywhere but Differentiable Nowhere

I have no idea why I picked this blog name, but there's no turning back now